Home page
This
website was created because there are two types of civil
law, which is is not made public. The official jurisprudence
by the state power, and the jurisprudence by lawyers and state
officials. Abuse of power and arbitrariness is common practice in
the FRG, against which affected individuals are defenseless.
Cables, deliberate fraudulent deception and bending of the law are
not punished, because criminal charges in this regard are dismissed
without investigation by the contacted state and general prosecutors.
Civil actions are also not possible because lawyers also refuse to
act in such cases. (They are, after all, the beneficiaries). The
provision of an emergency attorney is denied, although the
legislature expressly provides for this. The right to be heard in
court (Art.103 GG) is denied and also the basic right to effective
complaint with a factual processing and a factual decision, is denied
to individual people (Art.17&19GG).
A constitutional court
decision in this regard, (BVerfG,22.04.1953-BvR162/51 RN20-23) in
which a factual processing and a factual decision was demanded,
remained unconsidered. The petition was dismissed and the reasons
given were unobjective. The Basic Law with its fundamental rights is
ignored with impunity, and is thus meaningless. (Also the
Art.1Abs3GG. and Art.3 Abs.1 GG). The European Convention on Human
Rights (ECHR), which is binding on all Europeans, is also ignored,
and we are therefore not equal to the other European people. Lawyers
are thus allowed to block the entire legal process with impunity.
Thus, the ways to the Constitutional Court and the European Court of
Human Rights are also blocked. Lawyers are the highest judges on
earth for German people.
The loss of rights is felt just as
painfully as the loss of one's own child that has been murdered,
without the state authority of the FRG punishing the perpetrator(s).
On the contrary, one is attacked with bossing and mobbing, if one
resists according to article 20 paragraph 4 of the Basic Law.
Since
the psyche of the people in the FRG is not considered as a vulnerable
body part, all approached authorities, official and legal authorities
and also the public media are muzzled. They are not affected.
The
pollution of a part of a building which a tenant of a rented house
has caused, he does not want to remove himself ( §249 Abs.1 BGB ).
The
Further he had made rent debts, against which the attorneys
undertook nothing and deliberately in criminal way forbidden measures
against me took, in order to block me the legal way and thus I went
out empty. These criminal acts were not punished because no other
lawyer and no public prosecutor were willing to do so.
Since
lawyers do not have a duty to bring an action, like craftsmen and
merchants, their misconduct cannot really be punished, because again,
no lawyer would bring such an action, and there is compulsory legal
representation in court. Individual citizens are exposed to
arbitrariness. Rope systems and the abuse of power.
A petition
to the German Bundestag demanding that human rights violations be
included in the criminal code was rejected without plausible
justification. ( Pet 4-16-07-4500)
Another petition I started (Pet4-20-07-99999-001361)
called for
changes in the law. It was processed after a current statement of the
Federal Government of the committee service of the Petitions
Committee of the German Bundestag first unobjectively, because they
considered only the §78 ZPO, which should be changed, which was not
in question and was not demanded by me. A restriction of the lawyer's
compulsion (§78 ZPO) was not appropriate, it says in the answer
letter of the Federal Government. Pet4-20-07-3005-001361. After a
further letter of complaint my petition was then nevertheless passed
on for the purpose of examination to the reporters and worked on
allegedly intensively.
The new file number is Pet
4-20-07-380-001361.
Lawyers structure and filter the trial
material, and ensure equal opportunities and weapons in court.
Furthermore, they are supposed to protect against wrongful
convictions and loss of rights, according to the federal government's
response letter. In the Petition by me law changes were demanded,
which laws, should decide the legislative state power. It does not
need a current statement of the Federal Government. Furthermore, the
core point of my complaint was ignored, in which I pointed out my
rightlessness. When attorneys do the exact opposite of what is in the
mind of the federal government and the current laws, the federal
government still does not want to allow any changes, and blocks the
way to change the laws. The legislative state power is to look the
other way, if the articles of the Basic Law with their basic rights
are ignored and thus meaningless, likewise the human rights of the
European Convention on Human Rights (art. 6 and art. 13
ECHR).
Arbitrary right and rope courses are to be possible also
further.
Another letter pointing out the irrelevance led to
further processing under the file number Pet
4-20-07380-001361.
Lawyers need not fear any negative
consequences in practice, because no one can or wants to prove gross
negligence. The Basic Law with its fundamental rights is thereby
meaningless. Wrong judgments and loss of rights are to be committed
in advance by lawyers, because the Federal Government wants it that
way. "Mother Justitia" is to "bury her head in the
sand", as today's jurisprudence is manipulated and undermined.
Does the federal government still act in the name of the people
without taking responsibility? That violations of the Basic Law and
fundamental rights are not punished calls into question the entire
jurisprudence, and that is not the will of the people.
The
Federal President is obligated as a head of state to his "oath"
and must intervene if the democratic legal order is in danger. But he
let communicate that he is not responsible.
The federal
government may not ignore the constitution, which is still in force,
and dictate to the legislative power of the state whether laws are
changed or not. The threefold division of state power prohibits
paternalism. The people are not informed by the public media about
the lawlessness of individual citizens because they do not want to be
or are not allowed to be nest-dwellers. The democratic rule of law is
being undermined without the knowledge of the people, through abuse
of power, arbitrariness and cronyism, because supposedly there should
be "equality of opportunity and equality of arms before the
courts". Likewise no "loss of right is to take place before
court", therefore lawyers are to block
block the legal way
before. They are, after all, the highest judges on earth for German
citizens, and that should remain so. Individual citizens are not
considered as human beings, but as a "lawless thing" which
is judged by lawyers and they receive the lawyer's fees from the
people concerned.
Imprisoned mass murderers and child molesters
have more rights than individual people. The psyche of people is not
considered as a human body part and therefore does not exist for the
state power of the FRG and the federal government.
In further
links the whole matter is described in detail. On 2.12.2021 the
receipt of my petition described above was confirmed in
writing.
After several exchanges of correspondence and changes
in the file number, I was assured by letter dated 17.02.2022 that my
petition would be processed as soon as possible by a parliamentary
examination and I would receive a message.
On 23.06.2022, I
received a letter in which I was informed that my petition had been
forwarded to the rapporteurs of the Petitions Committee of the German
Bundestag. They will deal intensively with my request and then my
petition will be presented to the entire Petitions Committee and the
plenum of the German Bundestag for resolution.
On 19.12.2022 my
petition ( Pet4-20-07-380-001361 ) was rejected. The Petitions
Committee recognized that no legislative action, in particular no
penal legislative action, was required.
With the false claim
that I had demanded the abolition of compulsory legal representation
(before continuing courts) and also the complaint that lawyers are
allowed to block the legal process with impunity because the
associated crime cannot really be brought to justice, the petition
was dismissed. Likewise, no comment was made on my statement that
after reunification lawyers in the FRG act with virtual impunity as
the highest judges on earth, and thus constitutional complaints and
human rights complaints are also dismissed, because these complaints
are only admitted if the regular legal process has been completed,
which, however, is prevented by blocking the regular legal process.
My further written references to the false allegations in this regard
were ignored.
A factual processing and a factual decision, as
required by the Federal Constitutional Court in its decision (
BVerfG,22.04.1953-BvR162/51 R1\12023), did not take place.
The
Basic Law with its fundamental rights obviously no longer applies.
Likewise the human rights for all Eurpäern are binding, and part of
the international international law is, does not apply in the FRG,
because internationally the contract law is more highly valued than
the human rights. The German people have a voluntary contract with
the FRG, that they voluntarily want to live according to the laws of
the FRG, which is based on the Basic Law.
However, the contract
is only valid if each individual has knowledge about the state of
affairs and also knowledge about the consequences of such a contract.
The will to be legally bound must be present for such a contract to
be valid. Since nobody knows about the
meaninglessness of the
human rights of the ECHR and also about the inequality compared to
the other Europeans, the German people have been deliberately
deceived, and thus the contract, which is to continue to exist even
after reunification, is invalid. It can be challenged under § 119 of
the German Civil Code. Those who can prove that they have German
roots can have a citizenship card issued at the district
administration so that they cannot be expelled from their homeland.
Without an identity card, but with a valid passport you can live in
Germany.
Individuals are without rights in the FRG. The
legislative power of the state wants it that way.
A tenant from
Geilenkirchen has known that he may pollute parts of the building
without punishment and remains unpunished, because he does not need
to remove the pollution due to his insolvency and also does not have
to pay damages. In addition to the property damage of 40 000, -Euro
which he has caused, he has also made over 2000, -Euro rent debts made.
My
lawyer did not take any action against it and all the other
contested lawyers (52 lawyers) did not take any action against it.
Ropes were obviously more important.
The lawlessness of
individual people in the FRG also extends to wide areas of daily
life. Letters from the authorities were allegedly delivered, which I
did not receive, and also the
court decision from the Berlin
Higher Administrative Court, which was supposedly sent as a
certificate of service, I did not receive. Through a
By a
telephone call I had learned of the existence of the judgment and I
had to apply for a paid duplicate.
Furthermore, the bailiff
distribution office in Düsseldorf did not provide any indication
that my complaint to the then NRW Minister President (legal entity)
had not been delivered. I had to successfully serve this letter
personally.
In Germany there is no longer a democratic legal
system, but the twofold law, which is characterized by materalism,
arbitrariness and rope teams, and is deliberately made possible
because the rulers of the FRG want it that way.
Deliberate
arglichtische Täuchung and Rechtbeugung are criminal offenses in the
sense of the criminal law, but are not prosecuted, because no lawyer
and also public prosecutor's office is ready to file charges.
The
equality of the German people with the other Europeans was assured to
us by the victorious powers after the reunification. Obviously, no
one wants to enlighten the people and the German people shall
not
be put on an equal footing with the Europeans.