Home page

This website was created because there are two types of civil law, which is is not made public. The official jurisprudence by the state power, and the jurisprudence by lawyers and state officials. Abuse of power and arbitrariness is common practice in the FRG, against which affected individuals are defenseless. Cables, deliberate fraudulent deception and bending of the law are not punished, because criminal charges in this regard are dismissed without investigation by the contacted state and general prosecutors. Civil actions are also not possible because lawyers also refuse to act in such cases. (They are, after all, the beneficiaries). The provision of an emergency attorney is denied, although the legislature expressly provides for this. The right to be heard in court (Art.103 GG) is denied and also the basic right to effective complaint with a factual processing and a factual decision, is denied to individual people (Art.17&19GG).
A constitutional court decision in this regard, (BVerfG,22.04.1953-BvR162/51 RN20-23) in which a factual processing and a factual decision was demanded, remained unconsidered. The petition was dismissed and the reasons given were unobjective. The Basic Law with its fundamental rights is ignored with impunity, and is thus meaningless. (Also the Art.1Abs3GG. and Art.3 Abs.1 GG). The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which is binding on all Europeans, is also ignored, and we are therefore not equal to the other European people. Lawyers are thus allowed to block the entire legal process with impunity. Thus, the ways to the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights are also blocked. Lawyers are the highest judges on earth for German people.
The loss of rights is felt just as painfully as the loss of one's own child that has been murdered, without the state authority of the FRG punishing the perpetrator(s). On the contrary, one is attacked with bossing and mobbing, if one resists according to article 20 paragraph 4 of the Basic Law.
Since the psyche of the people in the FRG is not considered as a vulnerable body part, all approached authorities, official and legal authorities and also the public media are muzzled. They are not affected.

Since the psyche of people in the FRG is not considered a vulnerable part of the body, all authorities, official and legal bodies and the public media that are approached are muzzled. After all, they are not affected.

 Since lawyers do not have a debt to pay, like tradesmen and merchants, their misconduct cannot really be punished because no lawyer would bring such an action here either, and there is an obligation to have a lawyer in court. Individual citizens are exposed to arbitrariness, rope teams and abuse of power.
Since lawyers do not have a duty to bring an action, like craftsmen and merchants, their misconduct cannot really be punished, because again, no lawyer would bring such an action, and there is compulsory legal representation in court. Individual citizens are exposed to arbitrariness. Rope systems and the abuse of power.

A petition to the German Bundestag demanding that human rights violations be included in the criminal code was rejected without plausible justification. ( Pet 4-16-07-4500)

Another petition I started (Pet4-20-07-99999-001361) called for changes in the law. It was processed after a current statement of the Federal Government of the committee service of the Petitions Committee of the German Bundestag first unobjectively, because they considered only the §78 ZPO, which should be changed, which was not in question and was not demanded by me. A restriction of the lawyer's compulsion (§78 ZPO) was not appropriate, it says in the answer letter of the Federal Government. Pet4-20-07-3005-001361. After a further letter of complaint my petition was then nevertheless passed on for the purpose of examination to the reporters and worked on allegedly intensively.
The new file number is Pet 4-20-07-380-001361.
Lawyers structure and filter the trial material, and ensure equal opportunities and weapons in court. Furthermore, they are supposed to protect against wrongful convictions and loss of rights, according to the federal government's response letter. In the Petition by me law changes were demanded, which laws, should decide the legislative state power. It does not need a current statement of the Federal Government. Furthermore, the core point of my complaint was ignored, in which I pointed out my rightlessness. When attorneys do the exact opposite of what is in the mind of the federal government and the current laws, the federal government still does not want to allow any changes, and blocks the way to change the laws. The legislative state power is to look the other way, if the articles of the Basic Law with their basic rights are ignored and thus meaningless, likewise the human rights of the European Convention on Human Rights (art. 6 and art. 13 ECHR).
Arbitrary right and rope courses are to be possible also further.
Another letter pointing out the irrelevance led to further processing under the file number Pet 4-20-07380-001361.
Lawyers need not fear any negative consequences in practice, because no one can or wants to prove gross negligence. The Basic Law with its fundamental rights is thereby meaningless. Wrong judgments and loss of rights are to be committed in advance by lawyers, because the Federal Government wants it that way. "Mother Justitia" is to "bury her head in the sand", as today's jurisprudence is manipulated and undermined. Does the federal government still act in the name of the people without taking responsibility? That violations of the Basic Law and fundamental rights are not punished calls into question the entire jurisprudence, and that is not the will of the people.
The Federal President is obligated as a head of state to his "oath" and must intervene if the democratic legal order is in danger. But he let communicate that he is not responsible.
The federal government may not ignore the constitution, which is still in force, and dictate to the legislative power of the state whether laws are changed or not. The threefold division of state power prohibits paternalism. The people are not informed by the public media about the lawlessness of individual citizens because they do not want to be or are not allowed to be nest-dwellers. The democratic rule of law is being undermined without the knowledge of the people, through abuse of power, arbitrariness and cronyism, because supposedly there should be "equality of opportunity and equality of arms before the courts". Likewise no "loss of right is to take place before court", therefore lawyers are to block
block the legal way before. They are, after all, the highest judges on earth for German citizens, and that should remain so. Individual citizens are not considered as human beings, but as a "lawless thing" which is judged by lawyers and they receive the lawyer's fees from the people concerned.
Imprisoned mass murderers and child molesters have more rights than individual people. The psyche of people is not considered as a human body part and therefore does not exist for the state power of the FRG and the federal government.
In further links the whole matter is described in detail. On 2.12.2021 the receipt of my petition described above was confirmed in writing.
After several exchanges of correspondence and changes in the file number, I was assured by letter dated 17.02.2022 that my petition would be processed as soon as possible by a parliamentary examination and I would receive a message.
On 23.06.2022, I received a letter in which I was informed that my petition had been forwarded to the rapporteurs of the Petitions Committee of the German Bundestag. They will deal intensively with my request and then my petition will be presented to the entire Petitions Committee and the plenum of the German Bundestag for resolution.
On 19.12.2022 my petition ( Pet4-20-07-380-001361 ) was rejected. The Petitions Committee recognized that no legislative action, in particular no penal legislative action, was required.
With the false claim that I had demanded the abolition of compulsory legal representation (before continuing courts) and also the complaint that lawyers are allowed to block the legal process with impunity because the associated crime cannot really be brought to justice, the petition was dismissed. Likewise, no comment was made on my statement that after reunification lawyers in the FRG act with virtual impunity as the highest judges on earth, and thus constitutional complaints and human rights complaints are also dismissed, because these complaints are only admitted if the regular legal process has been completed, which, however, is prevented by blocking the regular legal process. My further written references to the false allegations in this regard were ignored.
A factual processing and a factual decision, as required by the Federal Constitutional Court in its decision ( BVerfG,22.04.1953-BvR162/51 R1\12023), did not take place.
The Basic Law with its fundamental rights obviously no longer applies. Likewise the human rights for all Eurpäern are binding, and part of the international international law is, does not apply in the FRG, because internationally the contract law is more highly valued than the human rights. The German people have a voluntary contract with the FRG, that they voluntarily want to live according to the laws of the FRG, which is based on the Basic Law.
However, the contract is only valid if each individual has knowledge about the state of affairs and also knowledge about the consequences of such a contract. The will to be legally bound must be present for such a contract to be valid. Since nobody knows about the
meaninglessness of the human rights of the ECHR and also about the inequality compared to the other Europeans, the German people have been deliberately deceived, and thus the contract, which is to continue to exist even after reunification, is invalid. It can be challenged under § 119 of the German Civil Code. Those who can prove that they have German roots can have a citizenship card issued at the district administration so that they cannot be expelled from their homeland. Without an identity card, but with a valid passport you can live in Germany.
Individuals are without rights in the FRG. The legislative power of the state wants it that way.

Individuals are without rights in the FRG. The legislative power of the state wants it that way.
   The employee of a federal authority who lived as a tenant in our apartment building at the time and knew that he was allowed to pollute parts of the building and remain unpunished because he did not have to remove the pollution due to his insolvency and did not have to pay any compensation. In addition to the property damage of 40,000 euros that he caused, he also owed over 2,000 euros in rent.  My lawyer didn't do anything about it and none of the other lawyers I contacted did anything about it either. Rope teams were obviously more important...

The lawlessness of individual people in the FRG also extends to wide areas of daily life. Letters from the authorities were allegedly delivered, which I did not receive, and also the

court decision from the Berlin Higher Administrative Court, which was supposedly sent as a certificate of service, I did not receive. Through a
By a telephone call I had learned of the existence of the judgment and I had to apply for a paid duplicate.
Furthermore, the bailiff distribution office in Düsseldorf did not provide any indication that my complaint to the then NRW Minister President (legal entity) had not been delivered. I had to successfully serve this letter personally.
In Germany there is no longer a democratic legal system, but the twofold law, which is characterized by materalism, arbitrariness and rope teams, and is deliberately made possible because the rulers of the FRG want it that way.
Deliberate arglichtische Täuchung and Rechtbeugung are criminal offenses in the sense of the criminal law, but are not prosecuted, because no lawyer and also public prosecutor's office is ready to file charges.
The equality of the German people with the other Europeans was assured to us by the victorious powers after the reunification. Obviously, no one wants to enlighten the people and the German people shall
not be put on an equal footing with the Europeans.

A new petition to the German Bundestag dated 21.04.2023, (Pet 4-20-07-10301-018141) which was written publicly for co-signing, I have demanded the following,
1. factual processing and a factual decision on a petition,
2. the possibility of lodging an appeal (objection) against a rejected petition.
This petition was not published so that nobody could "co-sign".
On 26.04.2024, this petition was also rejected because the Petitions Committee of the German Bundestag saw no reason to take action.
This means that lawyers will continue to be the highest judges on earth for the people of Germany (with the approval of the state authorities). The Basic Law with its fundamental rights will therefore continue to be meaningless. Likewise, human rights, which are binding for all Europeans, only apply arbitrarily. The blocking of all legal channels for people in Germany is a violation of human rights that the state power of the FRG expressly condones. The fact that this loss of rights is to be prevented by lawyers obviously does not apply if materialism, arbitrariness and cronyism are more important.

Sincerely. Lorenz Küppers